Courses - Dog Training & Educational Tutoring

Oliver Gray Oliver Gray

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Online Tests & ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Latest Study Notes

Are you worried about insufficient time to prepare the exam? Do you have a scientific learning plan? Maybe you have set a series of to-do list, but it’s hard to put into practice for there are always unexpected changes during the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam. Here we recommend our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test prep to you. With innovative science and technology, our study materials have grown into a powerful and favorable product that brings great benefits to all customers. We are committed to designing a kind of scientific study material to balance your business and study schedule. With our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Guide, all your learning process includes 20-30 hours. As long as you spare one or two hours a day to study with our latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager quiz prep, we assure that you will have a good command of the relevant knowledge before taking the exam. What you need to do is to follow the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam guide system at the pace you prefer as well as keep learning step by step.

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO
IEC 27005: Centered around ISO
IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.

Topic 2

Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.

Topic 3

Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.

Topic 4

Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO
IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.

>> ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Online Tests <<

Free PDF Newest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Online Tests

Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials compiled by the most professional experts can offer you with high quality and accuracy practice materials for your success. Up to now, we have more than tens of thousands of customers around the world supporting our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam torrent. If you are unfamiliar with our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials, please download the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager free demos for your reference, and to some unlearned exam candidates, you can master necessities by our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials quickly. So our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager materials are elemental materials you cannot miss.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q44-Q49):

NEW QUESTION # 44
According to ISO/IEC 27005, what is the input when selecting information security risk treatment options?

A. A list of risks with level values assigned
B. A risk treatment plan and residual risks subject to the acceptance decision
C. A list of prioritized risks with event or risk scenarios that lead to those risks

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the input for selecting information security risk treatment options should include a list of prioritized risks along with the specific event or risk scenarios that led to those risks. This information helps decision-makers understand the context and potential impact of each risk, allowing them to choose the most appropriate treatment options. Option A is incorrect because the risk treatment plan and residual risks are outputs, not inputs, of the risk treatment process. Option C is incorrect because a list of risks with level values assigned provides limited context for selecting appropriate treatment options.

NEW QUESTION # 45
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, which risk treatment option did Detika select to treat the risk of a potential ransomware attack?

A. Risk avoidance
B. Risk sharing
C. Risk retention

Answer: C

Explanation:
Risk retention involves accepting the risk when its likelihood or impact is low, or when the cost of mitigating the risk is higher than the benefit. In the scenario, Detika decided to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack because the data is backed up daily, and additional measures were deemed unnecessary. This decision aligns with the risk retention strategy, where an organization chooses to live with the risk rather than apply further controls. Option A is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which discusses risk retention as an option for managing risks deemed acceptable by the organization.

NEW QUESTION # 46
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Which risk assessment methodology does Biotide use?

A. MEHARI
B. OCTAVE-S
C. OCTAVE Allegro

Answer: C

Explanation:
Biotide uses the OCTAVE Allegro methodology for risk assessment. This is determined based on the description of the activities mentioned in the scenario. OCTAVE Allegro is a streamlined approach specifically designed to help organizations perform risk assessments that are efficient and effective, particularly when handling information assets. The methodology focuses on a thorough examination of information assets, the threats they face, and the impact of those threats.
Activity Area 1: OCTAVE Allegro defines the criteria for evaluating the impact of risks, which is consistent with determining the risk effects' evaluation criteria in the scenario.
Activity Area 2: In OCTAVE Allegro, a critical step is creating profiles for information assets, identifying their owners, and determining security requirements. This aligns with the activity in which Biotide identifies critical assets, their owners, and their security needs.
Activity Area 3: Identifying areas of concern that initiate risk identification and analyzing threat scenarios is central to OCTAVE Allegro. This is reflected in the activity of identifying areas of concern and determining the likelihood of threats.
Activity Area 4: Evaluating the risks, reviewing criteria, and determining risk levels corresponds to the latter stages of OCTAVE Allegro, where risks are prioritized based on the likelihood and impact, and risk management strategies are formulated accordingly.
The steps outlined align with the OCTAVE Allegro approach, which focuses on understanding and addressing information security risks comprehensively and in line with organizational objectives. Hence, option A, OCTAVE Allegro, is the correct answer.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes the importance of using structured methodologies for information security risk management, like OCTAVE Allegro, to ensure that risks are consistently identified, assessed, and managed in accordance with organizational risk tolerance and objectives.

NEW QUESTION # 47
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing this risk.
Based on the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

A. No, risk approvers are responsible for managing the residual risk after accepting it
B. No, the top management should manage the residual risk
C. Yes, risk owners must be aware of the residual risk and accept the responsibility for managing it

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 specifies that once a risk treatment has been applied and residual risk remains, it is essential that the risk owner is aware of this residual risk and accepts the responsibility for managing it. The risk owner is the individual or entity accountable for managing specific risks within the organization. In Scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and assigned risk owners the responsibility for managing it, which is fully compliant with ISO/IEC 27005. Thus, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which states that risk owners should be aware of and accept responsibility for managing residual risks.

NEW QUESTION # 48
Which of the following statements best defines information security risk?

A. The potential that threats will exploit vulnerabilities of an information asset and cause harm to an organization
B. Potential cause of an unwanted incident related to information security that can cause harm to an organization
C. Weakness of an asset or control that can be exploited by one or a group of threats

Answer: A

Explanation:
Information security risk, as defined by ISO/IEC 27005, is "the potential that a threat will exploit a vulnerability of an asset or group of assets and thereby cause harm to the organization." This definition emphasizes the interplay between threats (e.g., cyber attackers, natural disasters), vulnerabilities (e.g., weaknesses in software, inadequate security controls), and the potential impact or harm that could result from this exploitation. Therefore, option A is the most comprehensive and accurate description of information security risk. In contrast, option B describes a vulnerability, and option C focuses on the cause of an incident rather than defining risk itself. Option A aligns directly with the risk definition in ISO/IEC 27005.

NEW QUESTION # 49
......

Before you can become a professional expert in PECB technology, you need to pass ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam test. It means you should get the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification. The ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager actual exam is challenging and passing is definitely requires a lot of hard work and effort. Prep4cram will provide the latest and valid ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager test study material to you. It just needs to be taken 20-30 hours for preparation, then you can attend the actual test with confident. Besides, in case of failure, we will give you full refund. While, 100% pass is the guarantee we promise to our customers.

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Latest Study Notes: https://www.prep4cram.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager_exam-questions.html

Oliver Gray Oliver Gray

Biography

Have a question?